DOS Update - Dec 2004 Posted Dec 17, 2004  ©MurthyDotCom The U.S. Department of State (DOS) holds semi-annual liaison meetings with the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA). These meetings allow for an exchange of information regarding current DOS procedures and policies pertaining to consular and related matters. DOS responses to the last meeting were provided to AILA members on December 7, 2004. ©MurthyDotCom Fingerprint Checks for Visas ©MurthyDotCom The DOS advises that all posts have been taking fingerprints for nonimmigrant and immigrant visa applicants since October 7, 2004. The DOS reports that there is no fingerprint-processing backlog. The fingerprints are checked against the DHS lookout database, known as IDENT. A visa cannot be issued, however, until there is an IDENT response. The response will either indicate that there is no derogatory information or will flag that there has been a match within the system. ©MurthyDotCom Machine Readable Immigrant Visas ©MurthyDotCom The DOS provides that the 125 posts that process Immigrant Visas all issue Machine Readable Immigrant Visas. The documents required from the applicant did not change as a result of the issuance of this more technologically advanced visa. ©MurthyDotCom Consular Posts In Mexico ©MurthyDotCom The DOS acknowledges that there is nothing inherently wrong with a person in B status in the U.S. changing to F, H, or another nonimmigrant status. The DOS did not agree to encourage the Mexican consular posts to accept third country nationals (TCNs) seeking visas after such a change of status, citing the consulates' discretion to accept any TCN cases. We do note that, due to potential fraud concerns, it can be problematic at the consulates when people enter the U.S. as B-2 visitors and then change to another category, particularly if the change is filed within a reasonably short timeframe. ©MurthyDotCom J-1s ©MurthyDotCom The DOS advises that it is working to update the 1997 skills list that determines in some situations whether a person is subject to the J-1 two-year home residency requirement. The DOS has been directed by the White House to use the Department of Education's "Classification of Instructional Programs" to code the J-1's subject or field. The DOS does recognize that errors may occur in determining whether §212(e), the home residency requirement, applies. The DOS encourages J-1s who are unsure to seek an advisory opinion. Ultimately, however, the DOS opinions are advisory only, and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has final authority on §212(e) applicability. ©MurthyDotCom Technology Alert List ©MurthyDotCom The Technology Alert List (TAL) is no longer available on a public website, so there is no way to know if it has been updated. The DOS does not have plans to provide more TAL details at this time, as they view the TAL as information for the consular officers to determine whether a Visa Mantis Security Advisory Opinion (SAO) is necessary. They do not view it as a tool for the public. Further, if a company has an export license for something on the TAL, this does not prevent an individual whom the company plans to hire from being subject to an SAO, as the license covers the company rather than the individual. ©MurthyDotCom SAO Improvement Project ©MurthyDotCom The SAO Improvement Project (SAO IP) to eliminate cables for SAOs has been implemented at all posts worldwide for the DOS processing of SAOs. Though cables continue to be the means of communication with other agencies, the cables should be phased-out by December 31, 2004 in favor of the SAO IP process. A separate system with the FBI is also expected to be implemented by December 31, 2004. ©MurthyDotCom Electronic DS-156 ©MurthyDotCom The Electronic DS-156 form is expected to be updated in December 2004. The form will provide more space to answer various questions like: Have you ever been in the U.S.? Have you ever been issued a U.S. visa? Have you ever been refused a U.S. visa? No other forms, besides the DS-1648 that was made electronic in April 2004, are expected to become electronic in the near future. ©MurthyDotCom Kentucky Consular Center ©MurthyDotCom The DOS confirmed that consulates should accept the scanned I-797 approval from the Kentucky Consular Center (KCC) as proof of the approval, though some of the consulates have not updated their procedures to reflect this change. There is also an effort with DHS to have approval information sent directly from DHS to the consulate without the need for the KCC, but there is no estimate as to when this may occur. ©MurthyDotCom We are pleased to share this useful information with our MurthyDotCom and MurthyBulletin readers. © 2004 The Law Office of Sheela Murthy, P.C. All Rights Reserved
	Disclaimer : The information provided at this site is of a general nature and may not apply to any particular set of facts or under all circumstances. It should not be construed as legal advice and does not constitute an engagement of the Law Office of Sheela Murthy or establish an attorney-client relationship. Copyright : Documents from this site may be printed for personal use as long as the copyright notices are included on the print-outs and the documents are not modified or altered.