| |

DOL Clarifies Its "No Expedite" Policy
Posted
Oct 08, 2004
©MurthyDotCom
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued an announcement on September 21,
2004 confirming its nationwide policy of not expediting any cases for any
reason. The national policy is that all labor certifications, whether filed
through regular processing, RIR, or limited review processing, will be ruled
upon by the appropriate offices in the order they are filed. William
Carlson, Chief of the Alien Labor Certification Unit for DOL reiterated
that, under the national policy, there are no exceptions to this rule and
cases cannot be expedited for any reason.
©MurthyDotCom
This policy has been in place for a long time. Not all offices, however,
were following the policy. Thus, the DOL felt it was necessary to clarify
the matter and assure that the policy and procedure did not differ from
location to location.
©MurthyDotCom
While everyone would like his or her case to be processed faster, in most
situations it is simply necessary to wait one's turn. There are individuals
with compelling reasons to request special attention, however. The reasons
that people request expedited action on their labor certifications include
the "aging out" of minor children, the necessity of labor certifications for
beneficiaries to assert eligibility for relief in removal proceedings, and
various humanitarian considerations based upon medical needs of family
members. In the past some locations would have granted certain requests to
expedite, despite the official national policy to the contrary. The position
of the DOL national office is now that all such requests will be denied. All
cases will be taken in date order, regardless of the circumstances.
©MurthyDotCom
We support uniformity and the concept that each case is given fair treatment
and taken in the order of filing. However, the DOL has long been urged to
develop a policy that would allow for expedite requests in emergencies under
uniform and transparent procedures. While backlog reduction may go a long
way toward ameliorating the situation, there are circumstances that cry out
for a mechanism to move a case through more quickly. Prior to the Child
Status Protection Act, the Legacy INS was able to expedite cases for
children aging out. The consulates were mindful of this problem and often
accommodated special requests for these children. There should be a way to
obtain some very occasional, isolated, special action on cases involving
true emergencies and humanitarian considerations.
©
2004 The Law
Office of Sheela Murthy, P.C. All Rights Reserved

|
|