 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



|
|
USCIS Clarifies
245(i) "Grandfathering"
Posted
Apr 15, 2005
©MurthyDotCom
The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a memo in March
2005, that clarifies the eligibility requirements to benefit from §245(i) of
the Immigration and Nationality Act. In essence, this provision permits
individuals to adjust status to permanent residence, even if they entered
the United States without inspection or otherwise are out of status /
unlawfully present in the U.S.
©MurthyDotCom
What Does 245(i) Protection Mean?
©MurthyDotCom
In order to use §245(i), one must be eligible in all other respects for
permanent residence. That is, §245(i) does not, in and of itself, provide a
way to obtain a green card. It is not an amnesty. What it does is eliminate
a procedural barrier to obtaining the approval of the I-485 application for
adjustment of status that exists for people who have status issues that
otherwise would prevent them from qualifying to adjust status to permanent
residence.
©MurthyDotCom
Eligibility Requirements for 245(i)
Grandfathering
©MurthyDotCom
The Memo clarifies certain eligibility requirements for §245(i). The term
"grandfathered" is a legal term essentially including a certain group of
people under the law or exempting a group from a new law based upon a prior
act or condition. To illustrate using an example with no bearing in reality,
if a law is passed prohibiting people under 21 from driving, it might allow
those who already have drivers' licenses to continue to drive, even if they
are under 21 years of age. In this imaginary example, these existing drivers
would be considered as "grandfathered in" because of their existing status
as licensed drivers.
©MurthyDotCom
To be grandfathered under §245(i), a person must be the beneficiary of a
qualifying immigrant visa petition (usually I-130/I-140) or labor
certification (not the Labor Condition Application used for H1Bs) filed on
or before April 30, 2001. If the qualifying immigrant visa petition or
application for labor certification was filed between January 15, 1998 and
April 30, 2001, that person must also prove that s/he was physically present
in the United States on December 21, 2000, on the date that the LIFE Act was
passed. All potential beneficiaries of §245(i) must show that the petition
or labor certification was properly filed and approvable when filed. This
latter requirement essentially means that it had to be a good, valid case
when filed, even if it ultimately did not result in a green card approval
for some reason.
©MurthyDotCom
Grandfathered Person's Benefit Has Expansive
Scope!
©MurthyDotCom
The March 2005 245(i) Memo confirms that, once a person is grandfathered
under §245(i), that individual continues to be grandfathered until s/he
adjusts status and becomes a permanent resident. Further, that person may
seek to adjust status either under the original immigrant visa petition /
labor certification or using another basis to adjust status. For example, if
one had a labor certification filed prior to April 30, 2001, but now wants
to adjust status as the spouse of a green card holder who filed an I-130
petition on his/her behalf, that person is permitted to use the §245(i)
benefit to adjust status in the later case.
©MurthyDotCom
One who is grandfathered is also permitted to seek adjustment of status as
many times as possible, as long as that person pays the $1000 fee each time.
If, for example, one files an I-485 application under the diversity lottery
program, but the case is not approved in time, that person could still file
another I-485 application based on an I-140 petition or I-130 petition at a
later date. In the past, at least at some local offices, applicants were not
always required to pay the $1000 fee more than once, even if they filed a
second or subsequent case.
©MurthyDotCom
There is no expiration date on when an I-485 application may be filed to
obtain the §245(i) benefit. The §245(i) benefit remains available until the
individual has obtained lawful permanent resident status.
©MurthyDotCom
Labor Certifications Must Be Approvable When
Filed
To meet the approvable-when-filed criterion, a labor certification must have
been properly filed, meritorious in fact, and non-frivolous. Unless there is
evidence of fraud in a labor certification case, if the U.S. Department of
Labor (DOL) accepted a labor certification, it will be considered by the
USCIS to be properly filed and approvable when filed. If the labor
certification is later denied, withdrawn, or revoked after being properly
filed and approvable when filed on or before April 30, 2001, it still
qualifies the beneficiary for §245(i) grandfathering. (Example: An employer
files a proper labor certification on or before April 30, 2001. Before a
decision is made on the case, the employee quits. The employer is no longer
interested in the case, so it is withdrawn. The foreign national beneficiary
would still qualify under §245(i), but would need a new labor certification
or other filing to be able to use the §245(i) grandfathering benefit.)
©MurthyDotCom
Derivative Grandfathering
©MurthyDotCom
The spouses and children of persons who are grandfathered under §245(i) are
also grandfathered. The March 2005 245(i) Memo clarifies which spouses and
children have this benefit. The following scenarios assume that the spouse
or child does not have his/her own, independent basis to claim the §245(i)
benefit.
©MurthyDotCom
Spouses / Children :
©MurthyDotCom
At the Time the Petition or Application that
Conferred §245(i) Was Filed : If a person was the spouse or child of a §245(i) beneficiary at the time
that the qualifying immigrant visa petition or labor certification
application was filed, that spouse or child remains grandfathered under
§245(i) even if couple has divorced or the child has reached the age of 21
since that time. This means that, even if the spouse or child is no longer
eligible for derivative adjustment of status, the spouse or child can obtain
adjustment of status through any other means available and use §245(i) to
achieve this goal.
©MurthyDotCom
Acquired after
April 30, 2001, but in Existence When Beneficiary Adjusts Status :
If the spouse or child was not thus related to the beneficiary before
April 30, 2001, then such a spouse or child does not have an independent
basis to claim a §245(i) benefit. The spouse or child may only use §245(i)
if s/he is doing so as a derivative of the principal beneficiary of the
§245(i) benefit. This means that, if there is a divorce or the child ages
out, such spouses or children are not able to use the §245(i) benefit for
later applications or petitions. This is an important distinction.
©MurthyDotCom
Acquired after April 30,
2001, not in Existence When the Beneficiary Adjusts Status : Persons
who became the spouses or children of §245(i) beneficiaries after April 30,
2001, but who do not remain spouses or children (due to aging out) of such a
beneficiary until that person adjusts status may not use §245(i) for their
own I-485 applications.
©MurthyDotCom
After the §245(i) Beneficiary
Adjusts Status : Once the §245(i) beneficiary adjusts status, any
spouse or child acquired later is not protected by §245(i). The USCIS takes
the position that §245(i) is lost once the primary beneficiary adjusts
status, since the entire purpose of §245(i) is to confer the adjustment of
status benefit to that individual. Therefore, the benefit ends once the case
is approved.
©MurthyDotCom
Conclusion
©MurthyDotCom
We at The Law Office of Sheela Murthy appreciate the USCIS's clarification
of its position on this important and somewhat complex issue. Persons who
have a §245(i) benefit should be ready to prove it to the USCIS, as the
USCIS may not have their own records showing all potential §245(i)
beneficiaries. Those who need assistance proving qualification to adjust
status under §245(i) should consult with a qualified immigration attorney.
©
2005 The
Law Office of Sheela Murthy, P.C. All Rights Reserved
|
|
|