 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



|
|
PERM
Safeguards against Improper Employee Influence
Posted
Jan 09, 2009
©MurthyDotCom
Under the law, an employer's recruitment efforts in an employment-based
labor certification (LC) case must be made in good faith and without undue
influence by the sponsored foreign national. There are protections within
the PERM labor certification process intended to identify whether the
foreign national has any undue influence or control over the required
recruitment process, based upon ownership and/or familial relationships to
owners and founders. These protections are described here for the benefit of
both employers and their potential foreign national employees, who read
MurthyDotCom and the MurthyBulletin.
©MurthyDotCom
Background on the LC System
©MurthyDotCom
The
starting point for most employment-based green card cases is the labor
certification. The labor certification is filed by the sponsoring employer
and the final approval or certification is issued by the U.S. Department of
Labor (DOL), after determining that there are not sufficient U.S. workers
who are able, willing, and qualified for the offered position. This
determination is made after the employer engages in recruitment efforts to
locate qualified U.S. workers for the job. The employer is required to make
the determination without the influence of the foreign national, since the
foreign national is simply the beneficiary of the process and, by law, is
not allowed to engage in the LC recruitment process.
©MurthyDotCom
PERM Asks if Sponsored Employee Has Ownership
Interest
©MurthyDotCom
The PERM labor certification application, form ETA 9089, addresses the issue
of undue influence by the foreign national with a single yes or no question.
This question asks whether the employer is a closely-held corporation,
partnership, or sole proprietorship, in which the alien has an ownership
interest, or whether there a familial relationship between the owners,
stockholders, partners, corporate officers, or incorporators, and the
foreign national. We at the Murthy Law Firm have taken this multi-part
question and broken it down into its components to analyze each issue for
our readers.
©MurthyDotCom
Higher Scrutiny for Closely-Held Corporation,
Partnership, or Sole Proprietorship
©MurthyDotCom
One must first analyze the nature of the company to determine if it is a
closely-held corporation, partnership, or sole proprietorship. It is usually
clear if the company is a sole proprietorship or partnership. The question
that most commonly arises is whether the employer qualifies as a
"closely-held corporation." The PERM regulations define a closely-held
corporation as "a corporation that typically has relatively few shareholders
and whose shares are not generally traded in the securities market."
However, the regulations do not set a number for "relatively few
shareholders." IRS guidance suggests that a closely-held corporation exists
if at least half of the stock is owned by no more than five individuals.
©MurthyDotCom
If the sponsoring employer is a publicly-traded company, or otherwise does
not fit within the definitions of closely-held corporation, partnership, or
sole proprietorship, then the question on the PERM application can be
answered with "no." One need not be concerned with whether the foreign
national has an ownership interest or familial relationship with the
owner/s, officers, or founders. The question on the PERM application must be
read as a whole. Generally, if the answer to the first part about the nature
of the company is "no," then the part of the question about the ownership or
relationship to the owners, officers, and founders does not matter.
©MurthyDotCom
Ownership Interest Makes Sponsorship Risky
©MurthyDotCom
If the answer to the first part of the question is "yes," one must then
look to see whether the foreign national has an ownership interest in the
company. This is clear when the foreign national clearly owns all or part of
the company in any form. Confusion often arises where the employer offers
stock options as part of the overall compensation. Stock conveys an
ownership interest in the company. Stock options alone do not convey an
ownership interest. From a legal perspective and for analysis in responding
to issues, one could point out that stock options must be vested and the
foreign national must have exercised the option to purchase the stock in
order to have an ownership interest.
©MurthyDotCom
Certain Familial Relationships Could Result in
PERM Audit
©MurthyDotCom
The issue of family relationship must be addressed, if the answer to the
first part of the question about the nature of the company is "yes." The
question asked is whether the foreign national has a familial relationship
with the owners, stockholders, partners, corporate officers, and/or
incorporators. This is simple if the foreign national is not related in any
degree to the listed categories of individuals. It is more difficult when
there is some degree of family relationship, as the PERM regulations do not
define the term "familial."
©MurthyDotCom
Without a definition specifying which family relationships are close enough
to trigger a positive answer, there is uncertainty with regard to more
attenuated relationships. The Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals (BALCA)
case law addressing the matter of bona fide job opportunity in pre-PERM
cases has looked at both blood and marital relationships, going so far as to
include spouse, sibling, and even nephew. We at the Murthy Law Firm
previously have suggested that the DOL define familial as "parents, spouse,
children, siblings," consistent with the relationships that can provide
family sponsorship and derivative immigration benefits, pursuant to the
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). This would be consistent with the
situations in which an I-864 Affidavit of Support is required in
employment-based cases, due to the family member's having an ownership
interest in the petitioning business.
©MurthyDotCom
As long as the term remains undefined, this is an area in which lawyers may
differ in practice and approach. In general, if there is a potential
familial relationship that is not greatly attenuated, that information
should be disclosed and the necessary documentation prepared in anticipation
of an audit. Simply checking "yes" does not mean, in all instances, that the
case will not be approved.
©MurthyDotCom
"Yes" Should Not Result in Automatic PERM Denial
©MurthyDotCom
The DOL's purpose in asking the question discussed in this article is to
determine whether the foreign national / sponsored employee is unfairly
influencing the hiring decision in the PERM process. Thus, there are
situations in which the answer to the question is "yes," but it is still
possible to establish that the recruitment was conducted in good faith,
without any improper influence.
©MurthyDotCom
When Considering
Ownership Interest and Familial Relationship
©MurthyDotCom
If there is an ownership interest or a familial relationship, the DOL looks
at several factors. These include whether the foreign national has the
ability to control or influence hiring decisions; whether the foreign
national is related to a director, officer, or board member; and whether the
foreign national is a founder or incorporator. Whether the foreign national
is involved in management of the company, whether the company has a small
number of employees, and how vital the foreign national is to the overall
company operations will also be examined.
©MurthyDotCom
Documentation Required to Help Company and
Sponsored Employee
©MurthyDotCom
The DOL commonly requests documentation to assess these factors, including:
Articles of Incorporation / Organization; names of all company officers and
shareholders, as well as the titles and positions of officers and
shareholders and their relationship/s to each other and to the sponsored
worker. They may also request a statement about the financial history of the
company, including the total investment in the business by each officer,
incorporator and/or organizer, and the sponsored worker, as applicable;
copies of tax returns or audited financial statements for the company; and
documentation that the foreign national was not involved in the
interviewing, hiring, or firing of employees.
©MurthyDotCom
Conclusion
©MurthyDotCom
When a labor certification is filed by a closely-held corporation,
partnership, or sole proprietorship for a foreign national who either owns
part of the company or is related to an owner, partner, officer, or
incorporator, the case is going to be closely scrutinized for undue
influence. This issue should be considered prior to the filing of the case.
If it appears that the DOL standards can be met, then the matter needs to be
well documented in anticipation of an audit. It is important to obtain
proper legal advice in advance.
Copyright © 2009, MURTHY LAW
FIRM. All Rights Reserved
|
|
|