 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 






|
|
Murthy Success
Story : A Case of Mistaken Identity
Posted
May 01, 2009
©MurthyDotCom
The Murthy Law Firm is proud to share an interesting recent success
story involving long-delayed I-485 applications. The I-485 applications in
this case were delayed due in part to confusion involving a fugitive foreign
national. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) mistakenly
assigned the same Alien Number to a fugitive and to a law-abiding applicant
for permanent residence. The Murthy Law Firm filed a writ of mandamus, and
negotiated the resolution with the appropriate U.S. Attorney’s Office. These
actions resulted in the processing and approval of the delayed I-485
applications.
©MurthyDotCom
We appreciate our client for providing permission, allowing us to share this
unusual story with MurthyDotCom and MurthyBulletin readers. All client
information is confidential and none is shared without permission.
©MurthyDotCom
Delays Appear in I-485 Processing
©MurthyDotCom
In this case, the primary green card applicant was the beneficiary of an
I-140 immigrant petition filed by his employer. The applicant and his spouse
filed their I-485 applications in 2006, concurrent with the I-140 petition.
(This was possible as the case was EB2 and the country of origin was not India
or China, so the EB2 priority dates were current for all
other countries in the employment-based category at the time.) The
employer's I-140 petition was approved within a reasonable period, but the
I-485 remained pending beyond normal processing times. The priority date
remained current.
©MurthyDotCom
In order to obtain a decision on the case, the I-485 applicant contacted the
CIS Ombudsman and also made an inquiry through his U.S. senator's office. He
eventually made an Infopass appointment and inquired as to the reason for
the delay in processing his and his family member's I-485. The applicant was
told that his FBI name check and fingerprint check had been cleared in 2006
and that these I-485s were being held for security clearance from outside
the United States. Responses from the USCIS to other queries stated that
generic background security checks were being completed.
©MurthyDotCom
Two People Incorrectly Assigned One Alien Number
©MurthyDotCom
The applicant eventually learned, through further inquires, that the delay
in the I-485s was the result of a strange USCIS mistake. During a visit to
his local USCIS office, the applicant was fingerprinted and questioned about
his identity. He was told that he had been assigned the same Alien Number as
a foreign national fugitive who was present in the United States without any
legal permission. The applicant and this fugitive shared the same birth
date, the same (fairly common) last name, and both were from the same
country. USCIS had taken the applicant's I-485 and placed it in the
fugitive's alien case file.
©MurthyDotCom
USCIS Transfers and Frustration with Delays
©MurthyDotCom
During this time, the applicant's I-485 file was moved from a USCIS service
center to three separate district offices in three different states. These
transfers may have been a result of the confusion over the Alien Number that
was shared by the applicant and the
fugitive. Concerned about the last of these
transfers, the applicant returned to his local USCIS office. His
fingerprints were taken yet again and he spent more than an hour with a
USCIS Officer, who checked him for distinguishing scars on his forearms and
other details known about the fugitive. At the conclusion of this visit, the
applicant was told that USCIS still had not issued him his own Alien Number
and that his I-485 application and documents were still mixed with the
fugitive's records.
©MurthyDotCom
Mandamus Leads to Approvals
©MurthyDotCom
In order to force the USCIS to resolve any uncertainties and make a
decision, the Murthy Law Firm filed a writ of mandamus lawsuit with the
appropriate U.S. District Court, demanding that a decision on
the case be made by the USCIS and stating that the delays were unreasonable for the individuals
concerned. We explained the situation to the attorney representing the
USCIS. This resulted in resolution to the confusion of identity, and just
two months after filing the writ of mandamus, the USCIS assigned the
applicant a new Alien Number and approved both his I-485 and his dependent's
I-485 applications. As any of us can imagine, both were delighted and
relieved to finally be U.S. permanent residents.
©MurthyDotCom
Writs of Mandamus can be Powerful
©MurthyDotCom
This was yet another successful use of the writ of mandamus to resolve
improper delays in case processing by a government agency. We at the Murthy
Law Firm have utilized this procedure for a wide variety of delayed or
improperly processed nonimmigrant and immigrant cases. As noted in our April
10, 2009 article entitled,
Mandamus Lawsuits for
H1B, I-140, and Other Delays, cases that may be resolved include
those that have been delayed for FBI, Department of Homeland Security, and
USCIS security or background checks. Delays for other reasons, such as USCIS
errors, may also be resolved through writs of mandamus.
©MurthyDotCom
This summary is also a way to show MurthyDotCom and MurthyBulletin readers
the variety of reasons writs of mandamus might be worth considering in order to solve underlying
problems with both nonimmigrant cases, such as the H1B, and immigrant cases,
such as permanent residency (green card).
©MurthyDotCom
Conclusion
©MurthyDotCom
We at the Murthy Law Firm are proud to relate to our readers another story
with a positive outcome. We express our appreciation for the hard work and
cooperation of the USCIS officers and attorneys who labored expeditiously
with us, once this problem was brought to their attention. We also are
grateful for our clients' willingness to share their story to help others
who may need to consider options with regard to unacceptable delays on the
part of a government agency.
Copyright © 2009, MURTHY LAW
FIRM. All Rights Reserved
|
|
|