 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 






|
|
Murthy Law
Firm Submits Proposal to Revise PERM Form
Posted
Apr 27, 2007
©MurthyDotCom
The Murthy Law Firm recently submitted our proposal to revise Form ETA 9089
(PERM labor certification form) to a taskforce comprised of members of the
American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA). The taskforce is in the
process of advising the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), which adjudicates
Form ETA 9089. The ETA 9089 form is used by U.S. employers to file labor
certifications for their current or prospective foreign national workers;
the first step in the "green card" process.
©MurthyDotCom
ETA Form 9089 Changes Likely after April 2008
©MurthyDotCom
The
revisions are not expected until after April 2008,
which is the expiration date of the current version of Form ETA 9089. The
regulatory process, however, requires that much of the substantive work be
done well in advance.
©MurthyDotCom
Murthy Law Firm's Proposed Changes
©MurthyDotCom
The Murthy Law Firm made numerous suggestions, based upon our extensive
experience in preparing and filing PERM cases. We believe that our
suggestions, if implemented, would streamline the completion of Form ETA
9089, reduce confusion as to the meaning and implications of answers to
various questions, and decrease chances of wrongful denials of applications
by the DOL.
©MurthyDotCom
Our recommendations include the following changes:
-
a separate category
for employees who are medical doctors, with MD degrees
-
suggestions that
would reduce confusion in situations where employers are equally willing
to accept potential employment candidates with either specified
experience or experience in related occupations, as opposed to what is
classified as alternate experience
-
revision of certain
questions so that the response will accept "months" as opposed to
"years," since that will lend clarity
-
expanding the
definition of "foreign education equivalent" to include, where
applicable, a "combination of education from any institution/s
equivalent to the required U.S. degree," along with similar, other
relevant important issues
We believe that these
changes, if implemented, will benefit a great number of employers and their
prospective foreign national employees in the PERM labor certification
process. After agreeing with many of our points and thanking us for our
efforts, AILA advised that many of our suggestions would be utilized in
their proposal to DOL.
©MurthyDotCom
Conclusion
©MurthyDotCom
In the area of U.S. immigration law, there are many subtle and complex
issues. The PERM process revised the labor certification system in a
comprehensive and efficient manner. Neither the DOL nor the private
practitioners involved in the review process for the initial PERM form could
anticipate every nuance or potential problem. PERM is a form-driven process,
and deficiencies in the form lead to confusion and improper denials. The
consequences are devastating delays and lost opportunities for thousands of
families to live and work legally in the U.S. It also results in penalties
for U.S. employers, who strive to comply with the ever-changing, complex
immigration laws, regulations, and policies. It can take time to determine
all the problems with a particular form that are not obvious in the
beginning. There are matters that have come to light only through
application of the process over time. We at the Murthy Law Firm are pleased
to share some of our ideas and proposals to help further streamline and
improve the existing system, for the benefit of both employers and employees
who use the PERM system for the green card process. |
|
|