 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



|
|
DOL
Acknowledges Problems with PERM and pre-PERM Cases
Posted
Feb 10, 2006
©MurthyDotCom
The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) is working diligently
with the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) to resolve ongoing problems with
both PERM and pre-PERM labor certification case processing. AILA sent more
than 700 examples of PERM and pre-PERM cases with problems to the DOL, which
is looking into a variety of matters. These issues include (but are not
limited to): PERM cases taking over 90 days; PERM cases for which the
employer verification request has not been sent; closures of pre-PERM cases
for failure to respond to the 45-day letter when the 45-day letter was never
received by either the employer or the attorney; and closures of pre-PERM
cases for which a response to the 45-day letter was properly sent.
©MurthyDotCom
PERM Approvals Without Forms
©MurthyDotCom
There were some PERM
approvals issued by the Chicago PERM center in January 2006 for which the
approval letter was sent but the certified PERM application was not. While
some of these went to the employers instead of the attorneys of record, the
DOL believes that there are instances where neither the employers nor the
attorneys received the complete
certified PERM
application. In such a case, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services (USCIS) will accept the PERM approval letter along with a request
to contact DOL through
internal, government channels to request a copy of the PERM
application.
The USCIS appears to be following up on those I-140 cases requiring
attention. This topic is addressed further in
DOL Error Causes Missing PERM Approvals,
article #4 in this week's MurthyBulletin.
©MurthyDotCom
Other PERM Concerns
©MurthyDotCom
The DOL promised to respond regarding the matter of PERM cases pending more
than 90 days. Some of these cases have not had sponsorship verification. We
will update MurthyDotCom and MurthyBulletin readers once the
DOL provides a response on this issue.
©MurthyDotCom
The DOL stated that they will publish a set of FAQs within the next four to
six weeks. The purpose of these will be to address topics that pertain to
PERM denials, both "clear error" denials and substantive denials.
©MurthyDotCom
No concrete resolution was reached regarding problems stemming from the
45-day letters. The DOL did suggest a future "solution-finding" meeting to
include AILA representatives.
©MurthyDotCom
Conclusion
©MurthyDotCom
The DOL's efforts to resolve issues surrounding PERM and pre-PERM cases are
appreciated. We note that, while there are still some solutions to be found,
many PERM cases are going through the system smoothly, and we at the Murthy
Law Firm consistently receive both PERM and pre-PERM approvals. In light of
retrogression, it is impractical for many individuals to put off filing
until all of the kinks in the PERM system have been straightened out.
MurthyDotCom and MurthyBulletin readers should watch for our
updates on these matters as the DOL works to resolve problems with the labor
certification (LC) processing system - under PERM as well as the regular LC
and reduction in recruitment (RIR) systems.
Copyright © 2006, MURTHY LAW
FIRM. All Rights Reserved
|
|
|