 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 






|
|
Liaison Report : TSC
Posted
Aug 02, 2002
The MurthyBulletin and MurthyDotCom strive to keep our readers
up-to-date with the activities and policies of the various regional
Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) Service Centers. This
information, obtained through an American Immigration Lawyers Association
liaison meeting with the Texas Service Center (TSC) in February 2002, was
distributed only recently, in late July of 2002. It is for that reason that
we bring this report to our readers now.
Age-Out Cases for I-485
The TSC indicates that it requires six months advance notification for I-485
age-out cases. Aging out occurs when a child turns 21 years old and, thus,
is no longer considered to be a child. The sad consequence is that s/he is
no longer going to be eligible for permanent resident status in the category
of the filing. The INS will expedite processing of certain cases of this
type, in an effort to adjudicate them prior to the 21st birthday.
However, the INS must have adequate advance notification of the age-out
situation. The TSC stated that cases should be marked as age-out cases when
filed, even if the age-out will occur one year after filing. For more on age
outs and a law that should soon be enacted to fix the situation, see our
August 2, 2002 article, Age-Out Protection Bill Ready to be Signed
into Law.
Adjustment of Status of the Principal Alone
The TSC has, in some instances, been approving I-485 cases for the principal
applicant without simultaneously approving the derivative spouse and/or
children. Although it is policy to keep family filings together, if the
examiner has the principal applicant's case only, s/he will adjudicate it to
keep the fingerprints from expiring. The examiner then is supposed to
request the files of the remaining family members and adjudicate those
cases. TSC recommended continuing to mark such family group filings with
numbers (1 of 3, 2 of 3, etc) so that the examiner can clearly see how many
people in the family have filings that need to be adjudicated.
AC21 and I-140s
The TSC clarified that it does not require a new Form I-140 (Immigrant
Petition for Alien Worker) for AC21 portability cases. The AC21 law has been
discussed extensively in earlier issues of the MurthyBulletin. Those
articles are available by searching on MurthyDotCom. In these cases a new
job letter in needed, demonstrating that the position is "the same or
similar to" the position described on the labor certification.
EADs and Relocation
The TSC was asked about the procedure for people who apply for an Employment
Authorization Document (EAD), change their residences while the application
is pending, and the INS sends the card to the old address. The TSC advised
that when the EAD card is returned by the Post Office as undeliverable, TSC
will search their system for updated address information. If there is no
updated address information, the card will be stored for 6 to 8 months. If
the TSC receives updated address information before the EAD is destroyed,
the EAD card will be sent to the new address. The TSC recommended the use of
Form G-731 (Inquiry About Status of I-551 Alien Registration Card) to change
the address, with an envelope marked "change of address" on the outside. Of
course, the use of this local procedure does not eliminate the need to also
file an AR-11 (Change of Address Form), in compliance with INS change of
address notification requirements discussed in earlier articles of the
MurthyBulletin, all available on MurthyDotCom.
©
The
Law Office of Sheela Murthy, P.C.
|
|
|