 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


|
|
Government Sued Over Mishandling of Asylee Adjustment Cases
Posted
Mar 15, 2002
The February 22, 2002 MurthyBulletin included an article, available
on MurthyDotCom, on the American Immigration Law Foundation (AILF)
Annual
Immigrant Achievement Awards Dinner, which honors highly
accomplished immigrants and raises funds for AILF activities. One example of
these important activities is a class-action lawsuit, filed jointly by AILF
and a private law firm, against the INS, the Attorney General, and the
Commissioner of the INS for alleged failure to properly issue permanent
residence to persons who filed for the green card based upon a grant of
asylum status.
Individuals who are granted asylum status may apply for permanent residence
after they have held the asylum status for one year. There is no limit to
the number of persons who can be granted asylum status. Under law, however,
of these individuals, only 10,000 per year can be approved for adjustment to
green card status. An applicant can file for the green card, whether or not
one of the 10,000 numbers is available to him or her. There is then a
waiting list for allocation of green card approvals. Cases stay in
"pending status" until the approval can be granted.
The lawsuit charges that, over the past eight years, the government has not
issued many of the available green cards, has failed to keep track of the
numbers, and has failed to process the applications on a
first-come-first-served basis. Additionally, the suit claims that certain
individuals who are exempt from the limit of 10,000 are kept on the waiting
list in error, due to their being granted asylum status under certain
special programs. The suit also alleges that certain exempt applicants were
included in the 10,000 approved cases, disadvantaging those regular
applicants who should have been included.
The applicants suffer in many ways. They are forced to spend extra money in
order to renew their employment authorization cards each year, at a fee that
is now $120.00. They are required to undergo repeated fingerprinting, as the
prints expire after 15 months. They must also undergo repeated medical
examinations, at an expense of $200-$250 each. These expenses can cause
substantial hardship, particularly to asylees who often escape their
countries with little more than the clothes on their backs. In many
instances, these people are trying to send money to their families overseas
who are in desperate need.
But the delays cost these applicants more than money. They are subject to
delays in their ability to petition for family members and for themselves
becoming U.S. citizens. They may have difficulty enrolling in schools, be
unable to obtain loans necessary to the furthering of their educations, and
have to pay out-of-state tuitions even within their particular states of
residence.
The lawsuit claims that more than 18,000 of the available asylee adjustment
numbers were not distributed. The suit asks the INS to distribute the unused
numbers, administer the waiting list properly on a first-come-first-served
basis, and find a way to eliminate the need to renew the employment
authorization card for pending cases.
©
The
Law Office of Sheela Murthy, P.C.
|
|
|