murthy.com HomeVisit USAStudent VisaWork VisaGreen CardCitizenshipfamilyMisc
Search
 

Attorney
Law Firm
Practice
Affiliation
Rating
Mission
Community
Worldwide
Contact

















Government Sued Over Mishandling of Asylee Adjustment Cases
Posted Mar 15, 2002

The February 22, 2002 MurthyBulletin included an article, available on MurthyDotCom, on the American Immigration Law Foundation (AILF) Annual Immigrant Achievement Awards Dinner, which honors highly accomplished immigrants and raises funds for AILF activities. One example of these important activities is a class-action lawsuit, filed jointly by AILF and a private law firm, against the INS, the Attorney General, and the Commissioner of the INS for alleged failure to properly issue permanent residence to persons who filed for the green card based upon a grant of asylum status.

Individuals who are granted asylum status may apply for permanent residence after they have held the asylum status for one year. There is no limit to the number of persons who can be granted asylum status. Under law, however, of these individuals, only 10,000 per year can be approved for adjustment to green card status. An applicant can file for the green card, whether or not one of the 10,000 numbers is available to him or her. There is then a waiting list for allocation of green card approvals. Cases stay in "pending status" until the approval can be granted.

The lawsuit charges that, over the past eight years, the government has not issued many of the available green cards, has failed to keep track of the numbers, and has failed to process the applications on a first-come-first-served basis. Additionally, the suit claims that certain individuals who are exempt from the limit of 10,000 are kept on the waiting list in error, due to their being granted asylum status under certain special programs. The suit also alleges that certain exempt applicants were included in the 10,000 approved cases, disadvantaging those regular applicants who should have been included.

The applicants suffer in many ways. They are forced to spend extra money in order to renew their employment authorization cards each year, at a fee that is now $120.00. They are required to undergo repeated fingerprinting, as the prints expire after 15 months. They must also undergo repeated medical examinations, at an expense of $200-$250 each. These expenses can cause substantial hardship, particularly to asylees who often escape their countries with little more than the clothes on their backs. In many instances, these people are trying to send money to their families overseas who are in desperate need.

But the delays cost these applicants more than money. They are subject to delays in their ability to petition for family members and for themselves becoming U.S. citizens. They may have difficulty enrolling in schools, be unable to obtain loans necessary to the furthering of their educations, and have to pay out-of-state tuitions even within their particular states of residence.

The lawsuit claims that more than 18,000 of the available asylee adjustment numbers were not distributed. The suit asks the INS to distribute the unused numbers, administer the waiting list properly on a first-come-first-served basis, and find a way to eliminate the need to renew the employment authorization card for pending cases.



© The Law Office of Sheela Murthy, P.C.





 
 

Posted Mar 15, 2002