 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


|
|
State
Department Update on Diversity Visa Program
Posted
Jan 31, 1999
From
time to time, the Department of State issues guidance in the
form of a cable message to Consular posts (U.S. Embassies and Consulates),
and the Law Office of Sheela Murthy's Bulletin reports on some of those
cables that may be of interest to our readers. We describe below an update
on visa lottery processing for the 1999 fiscal year, known as the DV-99
program. The 1999 fiscal year began October 1, 1998.
The State Department has routinely disqualified certain entries which
were missing key information or which were otherwise prepared incorrectly,
for example failing to include photos or signatures. However, when instructions
have been less than clear, applicants have sometimes been given the benefit
of the doubt. For example, for DV-98 and earlier, the instructions did
not clearly state that information on spouse and children was mandatory.
Therefore, failure to include such information did not necessarily pose
a problem. However, beginning with DV-99, if an applicant is chosen for
the lottery and then indicates a spouse or child that was not mentioned
before, that applicant will be disqualified. Instructions for the DV-99
(and DV-2000) program do state that information on spouse and/or children
is mandatory. (Of course, exceptions are made if a person marries, or
has a child, after having entered the lottery.) Several thousand entries
were disqualified on the above basis, so an additional drawing was held,
and 10,000 more winners were selected.
The letter to notify an applicant that he/she has been selected for the
lottery, now incorporates certain security features as protection against
fraud. It uses "secure" paper which fluoresces under a black
light, and incorporates other anti-fraud features which make it difficult
to alter or reproduce. The text of the letters also provides certain clues
to authenticity, for example leaving out punctuation marks in certain
places. Undoubtedly, there are many other security features to this letter
that have not been announced to the public. Use of a more secure letter
will protect legitimate winners from having their valuable immigration
opportunity usurped by con artists, so the Law Office of Sheela Murthy
applauds this effort.
In order to protect persons who may happen to lose their letters, there
is also a procedure for issuance of a duplicate, which has a different
appearance from the original. Applicants who present duplicates can expect
to have the information verified before any immigrant visa is issued by
a Consulate.
The State Department has also provided posts with a manual to assist in
determining whether applicants have the equivalent of a high school education
or experience in a skilled job. The cable also included a reminder that
the proper Affidavit of Support form to use in lottery cases is the old
form, the I-134, and not the new, longer I-864. (The I-864 is used in
family based cases and in certain employment-based cases when the employer
is related to the employee.)
The Law Office of Sheela Murthy reminds its subscribers that those born
in India, China, Philippines, Mexico, Canada, and several other countries
which comprise a high percentage of immigrants to the U.S., do not qualify
for the DV Program.
©
The
Law Office of Sheela Murthy, P.C.
|
|
|